- From: Martin Stricker <shugal@gmx.de>
- Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2001 01:02:01 +0100
- To: www-xsl-fo@w3.org
Max Froumentin wrote: > > Martin Stricker <shugal@gmx.de> writes: > > > Yes, Dave meant the "Reply-To:"-header. > > However, a "reply-to" header will make it difficult to reply to a > message in private. A MUA should give the choice of either replying to > the 'From:' header of the original message or to the 'To:' > header. (Mine calls that 'Reply' and 'Follow-up' respectively.) > A 'reply-to' would prevent that choice. I have a "Reply all" button, too. There I just delete the group address. Usually I reply to the list with "Reply", but without Reply-To: this wouls send a message only to you, not to the list. And if I hit "Reply all" and forgot to delete your address you'll get this message twice... We had a similar argument about Reply-To: in xsl-list some time ago which turned out in leaving the Reply-To in the header. All mailing lists I'm subscribed to (about twenty, Linux, XML and Perl related) have the Reply-To header except this one (I just checked). So maybe this list will go the same way which works for the others? > See also > http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html I disagree... I don't have any problems... Best regards, Martin Stricker
Received on Tuesday, 6 February 2001 19:03:22 UTC