Re: PDF bookmarks (was: Re: extensions to FO) from Sebastian Rahtz on 2001-02-04 (www-xsl-fo@w3.org from February 2001)

From: Sebastian Rahtz <sebastian.rahtz@computing-services.oxford.ac.uk>
Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2001 14:15:42 +0000
To: www-xsl-fo@w3.org
Message-ID: <14973.25614.118589.152167@spqr2.oucs.ox.ac.uk>

David Carlisle writes:
 > tree. If some sections for example need a different page layout
 > then don't I have to change to a new page maste at rather a high level
 > in the FO tree, but I may not want to reflect that in the section
 > nembering or bookmarks (that is, I may want the sections to "logically"
 > be siblings even if they are in different page sequences.)

I very much support David here. PDF bookmarks are a useful facility,
and we should not be limiting their use to TOCs which simply reflect the
document.

Sebastian

Received on Sunday, 4 February 2001 09:26:28 UTC