- From: Kelly Campbell <camk@channelpoint.com>
- Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2001 12:21:22 -0700
- To: www-xsl-fo@w3.org
David, Thanks for pointing this out. I forgot to mention it in my question. Sebastian sent this example when I posed the question on the FOP list: <fo:block> <fotex:bookmark xmlns:fotex="http://www.tug.org/fotex" fotex-bookmark-level="2" fotex-bookmark-label="{@id}"> Bookmark Title </fotex:bookmark> </fo:block> The problem I have with this syntax is it's depending on the bookmark-level attribute to determine where it is in the hierarchy rather than just using a hierarchy via XML. I'm assuming that a bookmark with level 2 is just added to the previous bookmark with a level="1". I think using the inherent hierarchy structures available with XML would be a nicer solution. I am hoping that the FO spec allows for the XSLT-like syntax of enclosing elements from the FO spec inside elements from another namespace, and am looking for clarification on that particular question. Thanks, Kelly -----Original Message----- From: David Carlisle [mailto:davidc@nag.co.uk] Sent: Friday, February 02, 2001 12:05 PM To: camk@channelpoint.com Cc: www-xsl-fo@w3.org Subject: Re: extensions to FO You might want to look at the fotex:bookmark extension in Sebastian's passivetex FO implementation in xmltex. David _____________________________________________________________________ This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Control Centre. For further information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp
Received on Friday, 2 February 2001 14:22:01 UTC