Re: XPath 1.0 change proposal

On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 10:34 PM, C. M. Sperberg-McQueen <
cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com> wrote:

>
> If there was no intent to define the data model without dependencies on
> XML 1.0, then at least half the
> text in section 5 is pointless, unnecessary repetition of things that are
> obvious from the XML spec.
>

Please identify this half.  I just reread section 5, and I'm not seeing it.

All section 5 is doing is saying how to construct an instance of the data
model from an XML/XML Namespaces document. Period.

James