- From: Tobias Oberstein <Tobias.Oberstein@gmx.de>
- Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2001 00:08:57 +0200
- To: <xsl-editors@w3.org>, <www-xpath-comments@w3.org>
Have I missed something?? With XPath, there is the operator | which, if applied to a pair of node sets forms the set union, that is all nodes from both original node sets without duplicates. I wondered, where the corresponding operators for node set intersection (something like &) and node set difference (dif) are. N1 & N2 : the set of nodes from N1 | N2 which are both members of N1 and N2 N1 dif N2 : the set of nodes, which are members of N1 but not of N2 If there are none, *why* where they rejected from the spec and how could I simulate such (without modifying the location paths leading to the original node sets)? Or, will the next spec include sich stuff? Another issue for me is the semantics of comparison operators on pairs of node sets. This seems to be rather exotic. What I really need is .. NodeSet1 eq? NodeSet2 :<=> every node in NodeSet1 is member of NodeSet2, and vice versa NodeSet1 sub? NodeSet2 :<=> every node in NodeSet1 is member of NodeSet2 Of course, only sub? is needed because of ((N1 sub? N2) and (N2 sub? N1)) <=> (N1 eq? N2) Together with count(N1 & N2) = 0 N1 and N2 are totally distinct and ((N1 eq? N2) != true) and (count(N1 & N2) > 0) N1 and N2 are distinct this would complete the picture. Could anybody help? Greets, Toby
Received on Saturday, 7 April 2001 18:09:45 UTC