- From: James Clark <jjc@jclark.com>
- Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2000 14:38:37 +0700
- To: Graham Johnson <GJohnson@achieve.com>
- CC: www-xpath-comments@w3.org
Right. Thanks. Graham Johnson wrote: > > The statement in section 2.5 (immediately above the "NOTE:") that reads: > "div//para is short for div/descendant-or-self::node()/child::para " > should read: > "div//para is short for child::div/descendant-or-self::node()/child::para " > (In a previous paragraph, it was stated that > "div/para is short for child::div/child::para.") > > Graham K Johnson > gjohnson@achieve.com > Java Software Engineer > Achieve Communications, Inc. > Broomfield, CO
Received on Friday, 14 April 2000 04:29:56 UTC