- From: Gavin McKenzie <gmckenzi@sympatico.ca>
- Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1999 08:02:48 -0400
- To: <www-xpath-comments@w3.org>, "Gavin F. McKenzie" <gmckenzi@jetform.com>
Received on Tuesday, 17 August 1999 08:04:41 UTC
Folks, My cursory read of the archives didn't clarify my understanding of conformance... If I have an XML processing application that needs to express linking just to the extent of XPtr, but doesn't wish to support the many functions described by XPath, will this make my XPtr support non-conforming? (I want / need XPtr in my apps, I don't want / need the functions described by XPath) The intro-paragraphs of XPtr states that it builds upon XPath -- this implies that XPtr is a superset. The conformance section states that conformance is based upon supporting the syntax and all-conforming XPtr strings. Does this imply support for all functionality that is described in XPath? Regards, Gavin.
Received on Tuesday, 17 August 1999 08:04:41 UTC