- From: Denys Duchier <Denys.Duchier@ps.uni-sb.de>
- Date: 12 Jul 1999 22:48:46 +0200
- To: www-xpath-comments@w3.org
- CC: jjc@jclark.com
This is a comment concerning (Section 3.7) "Lexical Structure" in the XPath specification. James Clark was kind enough to send me some code clarifying the intent of the specification and I now realize that Section 3.7 plays an important role in disambiguating the grammar. I believe that it would be extremely beneficial to strengthen the wording in that section. 1. state explicitly that the tokenizing rules serve an important role in disambiguating the grammar. This may be obvious to those involved in the elaboration of the specification, but it is easy to overlook or misappreciate for an outsider. 2. identify the exceptional tokenizing rules (they are informally listed in the 3rd paragraph of the section) and clarify their precedence: e.g. is the 1st identifier in "and(" an operator or a function name? A more general comment: the specification does not make it clear (tout du moins, pour un lecteur non-averti) that the start symbol of the grammar is Expr (or, at least, that this is the most general phrase recognized by the grammar, or something to that effect). Instead, it starts in the "middle" of the grammar, with location paths, and then introduces larger phrasal types; I found that confusing. I am not suggesting a different organization, but again a strengthening of the wording so that the game plan becomes clearer. Here are some specific suggestions: "The primary syntactic construct in XPath is the expression" This should be followed by "and is described by non-terminal Expr", with an appropriate link to the corresponding production. "One important kind of expression is a location path" This should be followed by "and is described by non-terminal Location Path", with an appropriate link to the corresponding production. Furthermore, the specification should say that "due to their importance, they will be described first in Section 2", or words to that effect. In other words, the introduction should state clearly: _The_Grammar_ _Really_Starts_There_ (pointing to expressions) ... but _This_Is_The_Interesting_Bit_ (pointing to location paths). Sincerely, -- Dr. Denys Duchier Denys.Duchier@ps.uni-sb.de Forschungsbereich Programmiersysteme (Programming Systems Lab) Universitaet des Saarlandes, Geb. 45 http://www.ps.uni-sb.de/~duchier Postfach 15 11 50 Phone: +49 681 302 5618 66041 Saarbruecken, Germany Fax: +49 681 302 5615
Received on Monday, 12 July 1999 16:48:51 UTC