- From: Mike Brown <mike@skew.org>
- Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2006 15:05:17 -0600 (MDT)
- To: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- CC: www-xml-xinclude-comments@w3.org
Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote: > * Mike Brown wrote: > >It doesn't look to me like PEX5 (initiated by Bjoern Hoehrmann > ><mailto:derhoermi@gmx.net>) was adequately addressed. > > Looking at http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/PER-xinclude-20061003/ the Working > Group seems to disagree. Mike, did the Working Group inform you why they > insist on their incorrect proposed resultion on this matter? I could not > find a response in the list archive. > No, I am pretty sure I got no response to my message of 2005-06-14. It seems rather simple, doesn't it? If the intent is to say that XML 1.0 sec. 4.3.3's encoding-determination rules are to be used when doing (in the absence of external encoding info) a parse="text" include of a document that's tagged as being of *any* RFC 3023 XML media type ...then why don't they just say that, rather than naming a subset of XML media types and vaguely referring to "as specified in XML"? Mike
Received on Wednesday, 25 October 2006 21:05:42 UTC