W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xml-xinclude-comments@w3.org > September 2005

Re: nist-include-40 & nist-include-39

From: Bill Han <bill.han@oracle.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 15:45:45 -0700
Message-ID: <4331E299.2040408@oracle.com>
To: Elliotte Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
CC: Oleg Tkachenko <oleg@tkachenko.com>, Paul Grosso <pgrosso@arbortext.com>, Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>, www-xml-xinclude-comments@w3.org

Please tell me exactly where the spec says that.

Thanks,
- Bill

Elliotte Harold wrote:

> Bill Han wrote:
>
>> This has nothing to do with xi:fallback. I am talking about the 
>> content model for xi:include.
>>
>> <elem/> is allowed under <xi:include>? Then, how do you interpret 
>> <!ELEMENT xi:include (xi:fallback?)> ?
>>
>> xi:fallback is okay, b/c the spec says <!ELEMENT xi:fallback ANY>.
>>
>
> The content model is irrelevant. Validity is optional. Nothing in the 
> XInclude spec prohibits an xi:include element from containing 
> essentially arbitrary well-formed content not in the XInclude 
> namespace. There is no error here.
>
>
Received on Wednesday, 21 September 2005 22:46:13 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 23:09:36 UTC