- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 17:19:03 -0500
- To: daniel@veillard.com
- Cc: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>, public-xml-core@w3.org, www-xml-xinclude-comments@w3.org
On Sat, 2004-09-04 at 03:25, Daniel Veillard wrote: > On Fri, Sep 03, 2004 at 02:27:32PM -0700, Jonathan Marsh wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: www-xml-xinclude-comments-request@w3.org > > [mailto:www-xml-xinclude-comments-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Dan > > Connolly > > Sent: Monday, August 30, 2004 1:02 PM > > To: www-xml-xinclude-comments@w3.org > > Subject: how does XInclude mix with XML Schema? XSLT? > > > > > > Are there test cases of XInclude used in XML Schemas? > > in XSLT transformations? What are the results? > > > > > > -- > > Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ > > It is unclear what "XInclude used in XML Schemas" means. > That could mean XSD schemas using XInclude instead of xsd:include > to generate bigger schemas, and in that case I don't really see the > point. It seems useful to make a test case for that situation and label it "don't do that; you're on your own if you do." > That could also mean XSD validating the result of an XInclude > transformation but in that case what could be the problem, XInclude > generate an Infoset, and XSD works on an input infoset, I never heard > any problem with this. Seems worth capturing the fact that it works in a test case. > For XInclude and XSLT, yes this is used, people are using XInclude > to assemble large documents, and combine the XInclude and XSLT pass, > this is available as xsltproc --xinclude flag for example. It works > since if this feature breaks in some way I get bug reports. Again, that seems to merit a test case. > I also add > to pass the XInclude option down at the XSLT processor level since > people also wanted XInclude to apply to document() loaded parts. > > Daniel -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Friday, 10 September 2004 22:18:45 UTC