- From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
- Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2003 18:09:36 -0500
- To: www-xml-xinclude-comments@w3.org
I haven't finished going through the new working draft yet, but on first skimming it, I had an intense negative reaction to the accept, accept-language, and accept-charset attributes. This is not a formal comment yet, since my thoughts are still preliminary, and I may change my mind on further reflection. However, I really don't see any easy way to implement this. In Java it would mean using sockets or java.net.HttpURLConnection or maybe another library like Apache's HttpClient instead of java.net.URL. Certainly the XML APIs like SAX and JAXP and so forth don't have any options to add HTTP headers. Supporting this seems like a big imposition that would have radical effects on how HTTP connections were handled for XInclude processors. The saving grace is that this is only a should instead of a must. Still "should" is pretty strong in RFC 2119 terms. "may" would be nicer here. This aside, I hope to have XOM updated to the new syntax within the next few days. -- Elliotte Rusty Harold elharo@metalab.unc.edu Effective XML (Addison-Wesley, 2003) http://www.cafeconleche.org/books/effectivexml http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN%3D0321150406/ref%3Dnosim/cafeaulaitA
Received on Monday, 10 November 2003 18:12:56 UTC