- From: Murata Makoto <pgrosso@arbortext.com>
- Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2003 09:47:28 -0600
- To: www-xml-xinclude-comments@w3.org
[I'm forwarding a copy of this to the xinclude comments list, as it was addressed to that list but hasn't yet gotten to the archives. It is archived on the www-tag list at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Jan/0210 -- paul] >The XML Core WG has resolved the remaining issues you raise as indicated >below. If you disagree with these resolutions, please respond promptly >so we can present the issues as unresolved in our request for PR I agree with the resolutions for (2) and (3), but disagree with the resolutions for (1) and (4). >>1) XInclude ignores the media type (and probably the charset > parameter) associated with resources I see a conflict between XInclude and the WWW architecture and ask the TAG and Director to consider this issue. >> 4) XInclude blesses XPointer as fragment identifiers of text/xml, >> while RFC 3023 (XML media types) does not. > >The XML Core WG does not feel holding up XInclude for this purpose is >warranted, as there are no candidates for XPointer fragment syntax at >this time other than the XPointer features we have identified in the >spec. I certainly disagree with this decision, which ignores IETF. Cheers, Makoto
Received on Monday, 20 January 2003 10:51:12 UTC