RE: Definitions section

Thanks, we'll track that as an erratum if it's too late to change prior
to achieving Recommendation status.  Since we author these specs in XML,
we'll need to change our XSLT stylesheets to accommodate this change.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Brant Langer Gurganus
> [mailto:brantgurganus2001@cherokeescouting.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2003 6:52 PM
> To: www-xml-xinclude-comments@w3.org
> Subject: Definitions section
> 
> 
> The definitions section should use
> 
> <dfn>term</dfn>
> 
> with a style of
> 
> dfn { font-weight: bolder }
> 
> instead of
> 
> <b>term</b>
> 
> In this way, semantics are better communicated.
> --
> Brant Langer Gurganus
> <http://www.cherokeescouting.org/OtherUnits/Troop545IIN/brant.xhtml>

Received on Tuesday, 22 April 2003 19:49:38 UTC