- From: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
- Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 14:59:30 -0800
- To: "Elliotte Rusty Harold" <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>, <www-xml-xinclude-comments@w3.org>
This sounds like a good idea. I will ask the WG to allow me to add it. - Jonathan > -----Original Message----- > From: Elliotte Rusty Harold [mailto:elharo@metalab.unc.edu] > Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 6:55 AM > To: www-xml-xinclude-comments@w3.org > Subject: EDitorial suggestion for section 1.2 > > Secction 1.2 does not mention the fallback element as a difference > between external entities and XInclude. I think this is a crucial and > particularly easy to understand difference. I would add a paragraph > mentioning this, perhaps something like this: > > Failure to load an external entity is normally a fatal error. > XInclude allows the author to provide default content that will be > used if the remote resource cannot be loaded. > -- > > +-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+ > | Elliotte Rusty Harold | elharo@metalab.unc.edu | Writer/Programmer | > +-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+ > | The XML Bible, 2nd Edition (Hungry Minds, 2001) | > | http://www.cafeconleche.org/books/bible2/ | > | http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN=0764547607/cafeaulaitA/ | > +----------------------------------+---------------------------------+ > | Read Cafe au Lait for Java News: http://www.cafeaulait.org/ | > | Read Cafe con Leche for XML News: http://www.cafeconleche.org/ | > +----------------------------------+---------------------------------+
Received on Tuesday, 12 March 2002 18:00:54 UTC