- From: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
- Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 06:48:01 -0700
- To: "Markus Perling" <perling@dfki.uni-kl.de>, <www-xml-xinclude-comments@w3.org>
Thanks for the comments. The WG reconsidered this feature, which it had earlier rejected, and again decided that, however useful, this could be added in a future version. This is in keeping with our desire to keep XInclude 1.0 minimal, and to avoid some of the complicated syntax issues (such as where such syntax would be allowed, and how to deal with whitespace). > -----Original Message----- > From: Dan Connolly [mailto:connolly@w3.org] > Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2001 6:32 AM > To: Markus Perling > Cc: www-xml-xinclude-comments@w3.org > Subject: Re: passing attributes to included nodes > > > [your message went to me as moderator because > perling@dfki.uni-kl.de isn't in any of our subscription > lists. Sorry for the delay in archiving your input.] > > Markus Perling wrote: > > > > I have earlier implemented an XML inclusion scheme for my > own purposes > > which in some parts resembles XInclude. There I found it > very useful > > to have a mechanism to attach additional attributes to an included > > node. As far I can see such a thing is not specified in > XInclude; has > > this ever been discussed by the XInclude working group? Or > are there > > formal reasons not to allow this? > > > > Markus Perling > > -- > Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ > >
Received on Thursday, 28 June 2001 11:18:38 UTC