- From: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
- Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 15:23:19 -0700
- To: "Elliotte Rusty Harold" <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
- Cc: <www-xml-xinclude-comments@w3.org>
Sorry, I meant exactly one element node. Thanks! > -----Original Message----- > From: Elliotte Rusty Harold [mailto:elharo@metalab.unc.edu] > Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 4:28 PM > To: Jonathan Marsh > Cc: www-xml-xinclude-comments@w3.org > Subject: Re: Clarification for 4.2.2 > > At 1:46 PM -0700 8/15/01, Jonathan Marsh wrote: > >Thanks for the comment; please accept our apologies for taking so long > >to resolve this issue. > > > >We agree that inclusion of a top-level element is underspecified, and > >will update the draft to indicate that a top-level include element can > >only be replaced by a combination of zero or more comment nodes, zero or > >more processing instructions, and zero or one element nodes. > > > > zero or one element nodes? Wouldn't you want exactly one element node? Or > am I missing something? > -- > > +-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+ > | Elliotte Rusty Harold | elharo@metalab.unc.edu | Writer/Programmer | > +-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+ > | The XML Bible, 2nd Edition (Hungry Minds, 2001) | > | http://www.ibiblio.org/xml/books/bible2/ | > | http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN=0764547607/cafeaulaitA/ | > +----------------------------------+---------------------------------+ > | Read Cafe au Lait for Java News: http://www.cafeaulait.org/ | > | Read Cafe con Leche for XML News: http://www.ibiblio.org/xml/ | > +----------------------------------+---------------------------------+
Received on Wednesday, 29 August 2001 19:27:51 UTC