RE: W3C Working Draft 26 October 2000, section 3.4.1.1 from Jonathan Marsh on 2000-10-30 (www-xml-xinclude-comments@w3.org from October 2000)

From: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2000 09:26:27 -0800
To: "'julian.reschke@greenbytes.de'" <julian.reschke@greenbytes.de>, www-xml-xinclude-comments@w3.org
Message-ID: <330564469BFEC046B84E591EB3D4D59C164168@red-msg-08.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>

Yes, my mistake not to check all the examples to keep them in sync with
XPointer.  Thanks!

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Julian F. Reschke [mailto:julian.reschke@greenbytes.de]
> Sent: Friday, October 27, 2000 5:03 AM
> To: www-xml-xinclude-comments@w3.org
> Subject: W3C Working Draft 26 October 2000, section 3.4.1.1
> 
> 
> Shows this example:
> 
> <foo xmlns:x="uri1">
>  <xinclude:include href="common.xml#xptr(a/b)"/>
> </foo>
> 
> 
> Shouldn't this be "xpointer" rather than "xptr"???
>

Received on Monday, 30 October 2000 13:42:22 UTC