W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xml-xinclude-comments@w3.org > August 2000

Some comments on the July 17 XInclude draft

From: (wrong string) Śldal <d96-mst@d.kth.se>
Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2000 21:45:39 +0100
To: www-xml-xinclude-comments@w3.org
Message-ID: <zbzh5EpfhmbG092yn@d.kth.se>
In the second paragraph in section 3, it says external entities with
multiple top-level elements cannot be included from. Why not? It seems
to be that such inclusion can be useful.

About the issue XInclude-31-which-namespace. It seems like a good idea
to use the "xml" namespace, however an inclusion instruction like

<someelement xml:href="foo.xml"/>

looks a bit strange and doesn't suggest that it's an inclusion.
However, if you revert to the element syntax, then

<xml:include href="foo.xml"/>

would be very clear.
Received on Wednesday, 2 August 2000 05:19:43 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 23:09:29 UTC