- From: Daniel Glazman <daniel@glazman.org>
- Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2010 18:42:24 +0200
- To: "Grosso, Paul" <pgrosso@ptc.com>
- Cc: www-xml-stylesheet-comments@w3.org
Le 07/04/10 18:18, Grosso, Paul a écrit : > The Association Style Sheets draft at > http://www.w3.org/XML/2010/03/xml-stylesheet/ > is a public editor's draft of what is soon to be published > as a PER for Association Style Sheets Second Edition. > It is not in scope for us to make changes of a substantive > nature between a first and second edition. > > The XML Core WG does not feel that this specification > should define the meaning of pseudo-attribute values > beyond the general statements currently in the draft. > > The first edition already restricts xml-stylesheet > PIs to the "top" of the document; to quote: > > The xml-stylesheet processing instruction is > allowed only in the prolog of an XML document. > > As a second edition, this draft cannot change that. > Supporting scoped stylesheets is out of scope for all > editions of Association Style Sheets 1.0. > > paul Ok. So there is no specification at all defining what means the lack of the media pseudo-attribute on the xml-stylesheet PI and that behaviour is then, at this time, totally undefined in ALL current browsers. This is a severe architectural problem that, again, cannot be solved on the CSS side since your spec leaves it in the hands of the xml dialect. Quoting the document: This second edition incorporates all known errata as of the publication date, clarifies several areas left unspecified in the earlier edition. I am therefore raising an objection on this point since it does not clarify this area left unspecified. The WG's response on the scoped stylesheet issue is not satisfactory since, again from an architectural point of view, this spec will be inconsistent with the forthcoming HTML5 state of art. </Daniel>
Received on Wednesday, 7 April 2010 16:43:01 UTC