- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2013 23:01:21 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=23435 --- Comment #1 from C. M. Sperberg-McQueen <cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com> --- It is a fact about the Gregorian calendar that arithmetic on durations expressed as numbers of years, months, days, hours, minutes, and seconds is not necessarily precise. Life is hard. It does not seem to me to be the task of XSD to repair this fact, so the inability to perform arbitrary arithmetic operations on durations without running into quandaries like the ones described does not seem to me to be a flaw in the XSD spec. There are two simple workarounds: work only with positive durations and addition, or work with the two subtypes of duration for which arithmetic is easy and deterministic (namely those consisting solely of year and month or solely of day, hour, minute, and second -- these are deterministic for arbitrary arithmetic, as long as it is agreed that leap seconds do not participate in the date or duration arithmetic). In allowing negative durations, XSD is already extending ISO 8601 (following here, as far as I can tell, the lead of SQL and of Java); allowing different signs on different parts of a duration would be an ingenious solution to the problem you have encountered, but it would make XSD incompatible with XQuery and with other users of ISO 8601 durations. That does not seem to me to be a good idea. So I would recommend that the responsible W3C working group decline to make any change in XSD here, and respectfully suggest that they close the bug report with a resolution of INVALID (since XSD does not in fact define operations for its simple types) or WONTFIX. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 3 October 2013 23:01:22 UTC