- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2013 14:28:59 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=20863 Bug ID: 20863 Summary: Union types : "zero or more" vs. "one or more" data types Classification: Unclassified Product: XML Schema Version: unspecified Hardware: PC OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Datatypes: XSD Part 2 Assignee: David_E3@VERIFONE.com Reporter: ghislain.fourny@28msec.com QA Contact: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org CC: cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com The following paragraph 2.4.1. mentions that union types are the union of "one or more other datatypes": http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema11-2/#atomic-vs-list While the definition of such types allow for "zero or more" (which allows "user-defining" xs:error): http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema11-2/#union-datatypes Did I just miss something, or could it be a typo in paragraph 2.4.1.? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 4 February 2013 14:29:04 UTC