- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2013 14:28:59 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=20863
Bug ID: 20863
Summary: Union types : "zero or more" vs. "one or more" data
types
Classification: Unclassified
Product: XML Schema
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: Datatypes: XSD Part 2
Assignee: David_E3@VERIFONE.com
Reporter: ghislain.fourny@28msec.com
QA Contact: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
CC: cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com
The following paragraph 2.4.1. mentions that union types are the union of "one
or more other datatypes":
http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema11-2/#atomic-vs-list
While the definition of such types allow for "zero or more" (which allows
"user-defining" xs:error):
http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema11-2/#union-datatypes
Did I just miss something, or could it be a typo in paragraph 2.4.1.?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 4 February 2013 14:29:04 UTC