- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2012 21:02:54 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
- Message-ID: <bug-16860-703-lcUfzmzziU@http.www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/>
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=16860
C. M. Sperberg-McQueen <cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords|needsDrafting |needsReview
--- Comment #2 from C. M. Sperberg-McQueen <cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com> ---
A diffed version of the spec showing a draft erratum for this issue is now on
the server at
https://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2004/06/xmlschema-1/structures.errata-2012.html
(member-accessible link)
Accordingly, I'm marking the issue as needs review.
Michael, please note that your bug report specifically mentions the treatment
of failure to resolve on xs:include and does not mention the similar wording
used for xs:import. After a superficial examination of the text, I made the
change apply to both include and import.
Oddly enough, I did not see similar wording for redefine or override; perhaps
someone should make a more systematic search before we close this issue.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Saturday, 20 October 2012 21:02:55 UTC