- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2012 21:02:54 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
- Message-ID: <bug-16860-703-lcUfzmzziU@http.www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/>
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=16860 C. M. Sperberg-McQueen <cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords|needsDrafting |needsReview --- Comment #2 from C. M. Sperberg-McQueen <cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com> --- A diffed version of the spec showing a draft erratum for this issue is now on the server at https://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2004/06/xmlschema-1/structures.errata-2012.html (member-accessible link) Accordingly, I'm marking the issue as needs review. Michael, please note that your bug report specifically mentions the treatment of failure to resolve on xs:include and does not mention the similar wording used for xs:import. After a superficial examination of the text, I made the change apply to both include and import. Oddly enough, I did not see similar wording for redefine or override; perhaps someone should make a more systematic search before we close this issue. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Saturday, 20 October 2012 21:02:55 UTC