- From: Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2012 08:43:04 +0200
- To: "C. M. Sperberg-McQueen" <cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com>
- Cc: www-xml-schema-comments <www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAAK2GfFoVGTRRen3uzM8iW7v=irz2zEzXHskvETjdk6_CwpQGw@mail.gmail.com>
Oups sorry I didn't notice I was browsing internal copy Nevermind Mohamed On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 6:37 PM, C. M. Sperberg-McQueen < cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com> wrote: > > On Feb 28, 2012, at 9:52 AM, Innovimax SARL wrote: > > > Dear, > > > > The spec says > > > > [[ > > > > Independent copies of this material are available in an undated > (mutable) version at http://www.w3.org/2009/XMLSchema/XMLSchema.xsd and > in a dated (immutable) version at http://www.w3.org/2012/02/XMLSchema.xsd— the mutable version will be updated with future revisions of this > specification, and the immutable one will not. [WG note: dated versions > will be created only for public drafts, not for WG-internal drafts.] > > > > > > ]] > > > > But this URI http://www.w3.org/2012/02/XMLSchema.xsd gives 404 > > Sorry for the long-delayed response on this. > > I think there has been some confusion here. The text you quote appears > to come from > a WG-internal copy of the spec (sent out 24 February to document the > changes made in > response to your PR comments). The copy at > http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema11-1/ > has similar text, but it points to /2012/01 not /2012/02, and it does not > include the sentence in > brackets warning WG members that there won't be a dated version > corresponding to every > WG-internal draft of the spec. > > There is in fact a copy of XMLSchema.xsd in /2012/01, and the reason that > there was no > copy in /2012/02 (until we put one there after the comment arrived) is > that the WG did not > issue any public drafts of XSD 1.1 during that month; the pointer to that > location in the > WG-internal version of the spec is an artifact of the document production > process. The > bracketed comment was intended to make this clear to the reader, but we > now have > evidence that it has failed to do the job for at least two readers: you, > reviewing the > changes made in > https://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2004/06/xmlschema-1/structures.ep35.html, > and me, reading your email of 28 February. So I apologize for the poor > drafting. > > -- > **************************************************************** > * C. M. Sperberg-McQueen, Black Mesa Technologies LLC > * http://www.blackmesatech.com > * http://cmsmcq.com/mib > * http://balisage.net > **************************************************************** > > > > > -- Innovimax SARL Consulting, Training & XML Development 9, impasse des Orteaux 75020 Paris Tel : +33 9 52 475787 Fax : +33 1 4356 1746 http://www.innovimax.fr RCS Paris 488.018.631 SARL au capital de 10.000 €
Received on Sunday, 25 March 2012 06:43:34 UTC