- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2012 16:20:46 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=16080 Summary: Why does XSD 1.1 part 1 cite XSD 1.0 2E normatively? Product: XML Schema Version: 1.1 only Platform: PC OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Structures: XSD Part 1 AssignedTo: David_E3@VERIFONE.com ReportedBy: cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com QAContact: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org CC: cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com Reviewing the spec just now I noticed that XSD 1.1 part 1 (Structures) includes a citation for XSD 1.0 part 1 second edition in the list of normative references. Is there some subtlety here that I have forgotten about that means this is (a) necessary and (b) not harmful to the logical consistency of the spec? Or should it just be moved to the non-normative references? Or should it be deleted? Since I suspect that no one in their right minds could take it seriously as a normative reference, I am going to suggest that no change we make could affect anyone's review of the PR and propose that we class this issue as purely editorial. -- Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 22 February 2012 16:20:53 UTC