- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2012 23:30:48 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13935
C. M. Sperberg-McQueen <cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords|needsReview |resolved
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
--- Comment #16 from C. M. Sperberg-McQueen <cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com> 2012-01-06 23:30:45 UTC ---
The proposal mentioned in comment 15 and based on the suggestion in comment 11
was adopted by the XML Schema WG at its call today. The changes have been
integrated into the member-accessible status quo document at
https://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2004/06/xmlschema-1/structures.html --
accordingly, I'm marking this issue resolved.
Mukul, I am sorry but I don't remember whether you have member access or not.
if you have member access, please examine the changes and (as the originator of
the report) close the bug if you are satisfied with them, or reopen it if you
are not satisfied. If you don't have member access, please let me know (here
or via offline email) and I'll see that the text of the wording proposal is
sent to you for review. If we don't hear from you in the next week, we'll
assume that you are satisfied with the change (an assumption strengthened by
your statement in comment 13 that you're OK with the proposal in comment 11.
Pete, thank you for your comments on the issue; from comment 12 I gather that
you are happy with the change made; if this is not true, please say so within
the next week.
--
Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 6 January 2012 23:30:50 UTC