- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 16:34:33 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=16786
--- Comment #1 from C. M. Sperberg-McQueen <cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com> 2012-04-20 16:34:32 UTC ---
Not verified, but I think it should work if you write
<xs:complexType name="RestrictedProductType">
<xs:complexContent>
<xs:restriction base="ProductType">
<xs:openContent>
<xs:any namespace="##other"/>
</xs:openContent>
<xs:sequence/>
</xs:restriction>
</xs:complexContent>
</xs:complexType>
The discrepancy between the syntax display and the schema for schema documents,
on the other hand, needs to be resolved to make them consistent. I'm not sure
which to change.
--
Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 20 April 2012 16:34:36 UTC