- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 21:54:10 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13750 --- Comment #1 from Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> 2011-08-10 21:54:10 UTC --- It has also been noted in the JDOM thread that XSD 1.0 is silent on the question of what the [prefix] of the new attribute should be - see section 3.4.5. It has also been pointed out that the Infoset specification (unlike XDM) does allow "synthetic infosets" to be inconsistent, for example by having an attribute that is in a namespace but has no prefix in its name. However, I think it is undesirable that a schema processor should generate an inconsistent Infoset, as the history of this JDOM bug illustrates. One other observation: if we add the rule that in the absence of a namespace binding, the schema processor should invent a prefix, then we should also say that it should construct a namespace information item that binds that prefix to the target namespace. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 10 August 2011 21:54:12 UTC