- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2011 13:50:02 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13186 --- Comment #4 from Mukul Gandhi <gandhi.mukul@gmail.com> 2011-07-29 13:50:02 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > One problem with explicit lists of what can appear more than once is that they > are so easy to get wrong (as this issue illustrates); another is that once the > list is correct, the organizing principle may be unclear (which seems to me to > be illustrated again here). So I propose a different change in wording to make > the underlying principle clearer. How about > > 2 If <restriction> is present under <simpleContent>, then no > facet-specifying element other than xs:pattern, xs:enumeration, > or xs:assertion may appear more than once. > > This amounts to the same thing but is slightly clearer on what's going on, I > hope. > > Also, we noticed in discussion that 3.16.3 needs to have references to > xs:assert replaced with references to xs:assertion. Thanks, Michael. The modified wordings proposed by you look nice to me as well. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 29 July 2011 13:50:07 UTC