- From: C. M. Sperberg-McQueen <cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com>
- Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2011 08:10:36 -0600
- To: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Cc: "C. M. Sperberg-McQueen" <cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com>, www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
On Mar 15, 2011, at 7:00 AM, Henry S. Thompson wrote: > C. M. Sperberg-McQueen writes: >> ... >> So I think the status of the example is indeterminate >> in the status quo and probably should remain so: we >> cannot provide a firmer footing here without a >> complete revision of the foundations of the spec. >> Unfortunately, I don't think we are in a position to do >> that now. > > That seems to me unnecessarily pessimistic. I attach herewith > ... > for those interested in a demonstration that Algorithm O has the > necessary properties and does not require "over[much] intelligence". I'm sorry, I may be confused. Are you suggesting that we make a particular algorithm for reading schema documents (and in particular your algorithm O) a normative part of the spec? -- **************************************************************** * C. M. Sperberg-McQueen, Black Mesa Technologies LLC * http://www.blackmesatech.com * http://cmsmcq.com/mib * http://balisage.net ****************************************************************
Received on Tuesday, 15 March 2011 14:11:07 UTC