- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 14:08:38 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11354 --- Comment #9 from Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> 2011-03-10 14:08:38 UTC --- >Hmm. Why? That is, do you have an example in mind which is a) reasonable or likely to arise but b) would be ruled out by the above? I don't think I would want to insist, for example, that the definition of a union type in Dold is not circular, if the override resolves the circularity. This, I think would undermine the idea that xs:override operates essentially at the schema document level. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 10 March 2011 14:08:40 UTC