[Bug 11354] Mentions of "override" outside of the override section

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11354

--- Comment #7 from Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> 2011-03-10 12:16:15 UTC ---
>I think it depends on what you mean by "report an error".

Sorry if I'm using vernacular language. It's my lifelong habit, which persists
despite several years in the Schema WG. What I mean by "reports an error" is
that the schema processor says it can't use this so-called schema to validate
anything.

>Writing schema documents which _must_ be overridden before they can be
used is not something we want to encourage.

Agreed.

>I think it's clear that we need to require Dold as well as Dold' to "correspond to a conforming schema."

That may be too strong a requirement. As a minimum, I think we want Dold to be
valid against a schema which closely resembles the S4SD. We may also want it to
satisfy all/some of the other XML representation constraints. (It's a shame we
never did the work of expressing all these constraints in the S4SD using
assertions etc.)

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.

Received on Thursday, 10 March 2011 12:16:21 UTC