- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2011 11:14:44 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11179 --- Comment #4 from Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> 2011-02-08 11:14:43 UTC --- A further observation on comment #3: note that the XSLT transformation to implement xs:override is a schema-aware transformation, and it assumes that both the input and the output documents can be validated against the schema for schema documents. Note also that it's not possible to define a schema-aware XSLT transformation in which the input and output are valid against two different schemas unless the union of those schemas is itself a valid schema (which means they can't contain different definitions of like-named elements or types). Having said that, it would not be difficult to replace this transformation with one that isn't schema-aware. (However, this would be something of an admission of failure. Managing applications where there are multiple document types with overlapping vocabularies is a problem our users face every day, and if we can't do it, there's something wrong. It's particularly ironic that the problem should arise as a consequence of xs:override, which was designed explicitly to help in managing this situation.) -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 8 February 2011 11:14:46 UTC