- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 21:19:23 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10374
C. M. Sperberg-McQueen <cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords|needsReview |resolved
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
--- Comment #3 from C. M. Sperberg-McQueen <cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com> 2011-01-14 21:19:22 UTC ---
At the XML Schema working group call of 14 January 2011, the group agreed to
add sentences along the lines of the text shown in comment 2 to the sections on
the three datatypes in question.
This change has now been made in the status-quo documents at
http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2004/06/xmlschema-2/datatypes.diff.html
http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2004/06/xmlschema-2/datatypes.diff-1.0.html
http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2004/06/xmlschema-2/datatypes.diff-wd.html
(member-only links)
Accordingly, I'm marking the bug resolved.
As the originator of the issue, Mukul Gandhi should in the normal course of
events get an email notification of this change of status. It would be helpful
if you would examine the resolution of the issue and indicate by closing the
bug that you are happy with the resolution, or by reopening it that you are not
happy. If we don't hear from you in the next two weeks we will assume that you
are content with the resolution of the issue. The WG thanks you for helping us
make the spec clearer.
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 14 January 2011 21:19:25 UTC