- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 18:29:25 +0000
- To: bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
- Cc: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 MSM writes: > In re comment 2: speaking for myself, the replacement of the term "node set" > with the term "node sequence" does not seem to me to be unmotivated; the term > "node set" in XPath 1.0 is a bit of a misnomer, since the nodes are sequenced, > and the term "node set" is no longer used in the version of XPath to which XSD > normatively refers. My personal view is that many more occurrences of 'set' > ought to have been replaced here by current terminology, but the WG decided > otherwise. It was the removal of "exactly", not the change from 'sequence' to 'set' that I was commenting on. > I also cannot find the phrase "a node sequence one of whose members" in the > status-quo text of clause 3 of the constraint; are we looking at the same > version of the document? Or is Henry suggesting, in comment 2, that the scope > of the issue be broadened from clause 3 to clause 4, or to some larger area of > the text? 3 and 4, yes. > The change to clause 4 was made to resolve bug 5781 and was approved 17 April > 2009; see discussion in bug 5781 and in the April 2009 archive. Thanks, that's helpful. Certainly my _intent_ in offering new wording was not to change 'set' vs. 'sequence' anywhere -- if I have done so inadvertently please correct it. > The subject/verb agreement problem and the ambiguous reference to "those > node-sets" in clause 3 were introduced in XSD 1.0 and were apparently not > caught (or were thought clear) when this constraint was revised. Indeed, not a new problem. Still might be worth fixing, IMO. ht - -- Henry S. Thompson, School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh 10 Crichton Street, Edinburgh EH8 9AB, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440 Fax: (44) 131 651-1426, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/ [mail from me _always_ has a .sig like this -- mail without it is forged spam] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFNLKGFkjnJixAXWBoRAo78AJ9jjN7OiZzontsiIHQZEjnve8E16wCeNt8S UR3gOGH8LYu7hLZXy4fSDSA= =yazF -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Tuesday, 11 January 2011 18:30:42 UTC