- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 18:29:25 +0000
- To: bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
- Cc: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
MSM writes:
> In re comment 2: speaking for myself, the replacement of the term "node set"
> with the term "node sequence" does not seem to me to be unmotivated; the term
> "node set" in XPath 1.0 is a bit of a misnomer, since the nodes are sequenced,
> and the term "node set" is no longer used in the version of XPath to which XSD
> normatively refers. My personal view is that many more occurrences of 'set'
> ought to have been replaced here by current terminology, but the WG decided
> otherwise.
It was the removal of "exactly", not the change from 'sequence' to
'set' that I was commenting on.
> I also cannot find the phrase "a node sequence one of whose members" in the
> status-quo text of clause 3 of the constraint; are we looking at the same
> version of the document? Or is Henry suggesting, in comment 2, that the scope
> of the issue be broadened from clause 3 to clause 4, or to some larger area of
> the text?
3 and 4, yes.
> The change to clause 4 was made to resolve bug 5781 and was approved 17 April
> 2009; see discussion in bug 5781 and in the April 2009 archive.
Thanks, that's helpful. Certainly my _intent_ in offering new wording
was not to change 'set' vs. 'sequence' anywhere -- if I have done so
inadvertently please correct it.
> The subject/verb agreement problem and the ambiguous reference to "those
> node-sets" in clause 3 were introduced in XSD 1.0 and were apparently not
> caught (or were thought clear) when this constraint was revised.
Indeed, not a new problem. Still might be worth fixing, IMO.
ht
- --
Henry S. Thompson, School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh
10 Crichton Street, Edinburgh EH8 9AB, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
Fax: (44) 131 651-1426, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail from me _always_ has a .sig like this -- mail without it is forged spam]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFNLKGFkjnJixAXWBoRAo78AJ9jjN7OiZzontsiIHQZEjnve8E16wCeNt8S
UR3gOGH8LYu7hLZXy4fSDSA=
=yazF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Tuesday, 11 January 2011 18:30:42 UTC