- From: Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com>
- Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 22:42:58 +0100
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
On 26/04/2011 19:27, bugzilla@jessica.w3.org wrote: > http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12300 > > C. M. Sperberg-McQueen<cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com> changed: > > What |Removed |Added > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Keywords|needsDrafting |needsReview > > --- Comment #1 from C. M. Sperberg-McQueen<cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com> 2011-04-26 18:27:45 UTC --- > A three-part wording proposal intended to resolve this issue is on the server > at > > http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2004/06/xmlschema-2/datatypes.b12300.html > http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2004/06/xmlschema-1/structures.b12300.html > http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2004/06/pD/precisionDecimal.html > (all links member-only) > In Part 2, the precisionDecimal row needs to be deleted from the table in 4.1.5 In Part 1, in 3.13.4.2, the Note relating to precisionDecimal appears to be present in both deleted and undeleted forms. Similarly the reference to Chamberlain 2006. The draft Note appears to have lost all discussion of how precisionDecimal might work in assertions given the absence of XPath support for the type. (That is, the material semi-deleted from Part 1). Michael Kay Saxonica
Received on Tuesday, 26 April 2011 21:43:26 UTC