- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2011 14:57:36 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=2753
David Ezell <David_E3@VERIFONE.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords|editorial |decided
CC| |David_E3@VERIFONE.com
--- Comment #5 from David Ezell <David_E3@VERIFONE.com> 2011-04-04 14:57:33 UTC ---
I made the following changes to the diagram, approved by Mary, so this item
becomes "decided".
>
> No annotations anywhere (I think this is probably OK, but
> we should say something in the verbiage about it)
[DE] added
>
> No names for named components anywhere: should be
> a property, no?
[DE] already fixed.
>
> Open Content?
[DE] shown as an association (property records seem a bridge too far).
>
> Schema:
> missing link to identity constraint definitions
[DE] already fixed.
>
> Simple type definition:
> facets are components, not properties
> Facet component has properties fixed and value
[DE] done.
> hmmm... but the value property for the assertion facet is an
> assertion,
> so maybe you need a link as well?
[DE] decided not to show the link from facet to assertion, but did add an
Assertion component.
> item type definition, where?
> member type definitions, where?
> primitive type definition, where?
[DE] added as properties.
> context, where?
[DE] already done.
>
> Complex type definition:
> base type definition, where?
> context, where?
[DE] already done.
>
> Attribute group definition
> missing from top part of diagram entirely
> (attribute uses, attribute wildcard)
[DE] already done.
>
> Model group definition, likewise
[DE] already done.
>
> Element Declaration
> points to a CTA, which should be a Type Table
> Type Table needs links to default type definition and to
> alteratives
> alternatives are Type Alternative component with property
> test
> and link to
>
> type definition
[DE] opted to keep consistent with property record treatment and make a
property.
> scope, where?
[DE] ditto.
> substitution group affiliations should be link to components, not
> a
> property
[DE] done.
>
> Identity Constraint Definition
> referenced key should be link to component, not a property
[DE] already done.
>
> Assertions
> missing test property
[DE] added.
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 4 April 2011 14:57:40 UTC