- From: Mukul Gandhi <gandhi.mukul@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2010 04:52:29 +0530
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
Hi all, In the latest XML Schema 1.1 working draft the following is mentioned about xs:redefine instruction, Editorial Note: Priority Feedback Request <quote> The Working Group requests feedback from readers, schema authors, implementors, and other users of this specification as to the desirability of retaining, removing, deprecating, or not deprecating the use of <redefine>. Since the <override> facility provides similar functionality but does not require a restriction or extension relation between the new and the old definitions of redefined components, the Working Group is particularly interested in learning whether users of this specification find that requirement useful or not. </quote> Here's my personal opinion please about xs:redefine instruction: It's a useful schema instruction, and shouldn't be removed or deprecated and should exist side by side with xs:override instruction. I believe the capability to incorporate schema components in a source (parent) schema via xs:redefine with semantics of restriction or extension is an important capability, as is the newer XML Schema 1.1 xs:override instruction which provides unconstrained incorporation of schema components. If the XML schema working group hasn't taken a final decision in this regard, I would request to remove the word deprecated from xs:redefine in XML Schema 1.1 spec. -- Regards, Mukul Gandhi
Received on Sunday, 21 November 2010 23:23:28 UTC