- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2009 15:07:29 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8458 Summary: <alternative> not explicitly identified as absent in reference to global element Product: XML Schema Version: 1.1 only Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows 2000 Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P2 Component: Structures: XSD Part 1 AssignedTo: David_E3@VERIFONE.com ReportedBy: kbraun@obj-sys.com QAContact: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org CC: cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com In section 3.3.3, step 2.2 reads: If ref is present, then all of <complexType>, <simpleType>, <key>, <keyref>, <unique>, nillable, default, fixed, form, block and type are absent, i.e. only minOccurs, maxOccurs, id and <annotation> are allowed to appear together with ref. It should probably mention <alternative> and read: If ref is present, then all of <complexType>, <simpleType>, <alternative>, <key>, <keyref>, <unique>, nillable, default, fixed, form, block and type are absent, i.e. only minOccurs, maxOccurs, id and <annotation> are allowed to appear together with ref. At least, I think that is the intention. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 8 December 2009 15:07:31 UTC