- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2009 21:27:33 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5156
C. M. Sperberg-McQueen <cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Keywords|needsReview |resolved
Resolution| |FIXED
--- Comment #8 from C. M. Sperberg-McQueen <cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com> 2009-10-23 21:27:33 ---
The wording proposal mentioned in comment 7 was adopted, with minor amendments,
on today's XML Schema working group call and has been integrated into the
status quo document. The amendments were:
In 3.4.2.3.3, change clause 2.1.3 by:
- deleting the first (old) version of the sentence (thus correcting an error
in preparing the proposal)
- change 'with minOccurs = 0 and with' to the old formulation, 'whose
minOccurs attribute has the actual value 0 and which has'
In the Note added in 3.4.2.4, change 'allowed' to 'allows'.
I'm marking this resolved.
John, as the originator, you and the SML WG have the right to express an
opinion in the usual way. Two weeks, and we'll assume you're happy.
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 23 October 2009 21:27:37 UTC