- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2009 20:44:25 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=7695 --- Comment #2 from Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> 2009-10-07 20:44:24 --- Thanks for this extra input. I had completely overlooked the existence of the named PSVI subsets defined in C.1. They do indeed shed a new light on the intent of the WG with regards to the conformance status of a processor that does not make the full PSVI available to the application (and provide extra justification for the need to revise section 2.4 to achieve consistency). -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 7 October 2009 20:44:26 UTC