- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2009 19:11:34 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=7813
Summary: defaultOpenContent should not prevent inheriting
openContent when using extension
Product: XML Schema
Version: 1.1 only
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows XP
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: Structures: XSD Part 1
AssignedTo: David_E3@VERIFONE.com
ReportedBy: kbraun@obj-sys.com
QAContact: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
CC: cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com
I posted to xmlschema-dev about this but didn't get any feedback, so I'm
opening this.
Consider this schema:
<xs:schema ...>
<xs:defaultOpenContent mode="interleave">
<xs:any namespace="xyz:myURI">
</xs:defaultOpenContent>
...
<xs:complexType name="Base">
<xs:openContent mode="interleave">
<xs:any namespace="##any">
</xs:openContent>
<xs:sequence>
<xs:element name="elemOne"/>
</xs:sequence>
</xs:complexType>
<xs:complexType name="Derived">
<xs:complexContent>
<xs:extension base="Base">
<xs:sequence>
<xs:element name="elemTwo"/>
</xs:sequence>
</xs:extension>
</xs:complexContent>
</xs:complexType>
...
</xs:schema>
In Base, we use an open content that allows elements from any namespace,
whereas the default the open content is more restrictive (only match
xyz:myURI). We extend Base to create Derived. According to Mapping Rules for
Content Type Property of Complex Content (§3.4.2.3.3), Derived gets its {open
content} from the schema default, allowing only xyz:myURI. However, that
violates 3.4.6.2 Derivation Valid (Extension) (point 1.4.3.2.2.4 - the
namespace subset requirement).
When applying step 4.2.3 in the mapping rules to Derived, it looks like we're
getting ready to inherit the {open content} from Base, but then we turn around
in steps 5 and 6 and take the default open content, which leads to the above
violation. I find it hard to believe that this was the intended behavior. I
would have thought it most natural to inherit the open content from the base
type.
It may be that I am missing something, or that what I just described is really
the intended behavior, but I am certainly surprised by it, and suspect users of
XSD would be likewise surprised. It isn't entirely unreasonable behavior, but
I found it surprising enough that I wanted to pose this question to make sure
an error wasn't made in the mapping.
Thanks,
--
Kevin Braun
Objective Systems, Inc.
http://www.obj-sys.com
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 5 October 2009 19:11:38 UTC