- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 17:12:10 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=7678 --- Comment #3 from Steve Allen <sla@ucolick.org> 2009-09-28 17:12:09 --- (In reply to comment #2) > respect to the last paragraph of the issue description note only that the spec > describes the offset as an offset from UTC, not from Posix time_t. I hope > rather than affirm that this means no adjustment to the text is necessary in > order for the behavior of XSD types to be well defined in the event that the > scenario described in the issue description comes to pass. There is no telling what the ITU-R will decide, but there is another possible scenario. The laws of some countries specify mean solar time, and it is possible that their reaction to a UTC without leap seconds would be to add subsequent leap seconds into the zone offset for their own jurisdiction. Again whereas the POSIX specification currently can handle this, in this case the XML Schema specification would fail to represent the time zone of any such countries because their zone offsets would no longer be integer minutes. The indications from the status quo are that the UK, Denmark, and China all consider mean solar time more important than atomic time. The long history of time scales shows that any scale controlled by someone else is subject to change its characteristics at their whim. It is very hard to future-proof a standard against this, but allowing zone offsets of seconds would both match the capabilities of POSIX and handle the most plausible zone scenarios. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 28 September 2009 17:12:18 UTC