- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 07:59:25 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=7366
Summary: Support JCnQName type
Product: XML Schema
Version: 1.1 only
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows XP
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: Datatypes: XSD Part 2
AssignedTo: David_E3@VERIFONE.com
ReportedBy: petexmldev@codalogic.com
QAContact: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
CC: cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com
Discussions on the xml-dev mailing list have suggested that the use of QNames
can be problematic, especially when they become disassociated with the
documents thay were initially contained in (due to namespace prefix mappings
being lost).
One way to address this is to use James Clark notation qualified names (e.g.
{http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema}element ) rather than QNames that rely on
prefixes.
A James Clark notation qualified name suggests a type name of JCnQName. Other
suggested names are Explicitly Qualified Name (EQName), and Canonically
Qualified Name (CQName).
The expectation is that this change won't make it into datatypes 1.1., but this
entry will formally record it as an input to datatypes 1.2.
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 19 August 2009 07:59:35 UTC