- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 07:59:25 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=7366 Summary: Support JCnQName type Product: XML Schema Version: 1.1 only Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows XP Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Datatypes: XSD Part 2 AssignedTo: David_E3@VERIFONE.com ReportedBy: petexmldev@codalogic.com QAContact: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org CC: cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com Discussions on the xml-dev mailing list have suggested that the use of QNames can be problematic, especially when they become disassociated with the documents thay were initially contained in (due to namespace prefix mappings being lost). One way to address this is to use James Clark notation qualified names (e.g. {http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema}element ) rather than QNames that rely on prefixes. A James Clark notation qualified name suggests a type name of JCnQName. Other suggested names are Explicitly Qualified Name (EQName), and Canonically Qualified Name (CQName). The expectation is that this change won't make it into datatypes 1.1., but this entry will formally record it as an input to datatypes 1.2. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 19 August 2009 07:59:35 UTC