- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2009 04:30:26 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=7198 --- Comment #3 from Mukul Gandhi <gandhi.mukul@gmail.com> 2009-08-04 04:30:25 --- (In reply to comment #1) Thanks for the explanation. I think, I am now quite clear about the inheritable attributes concept. As I wrote in my earlier message, I was under impression, that if an attribute is declared as inheritable, then it may actually be copied (i.e, physically be present) in the descendant elements. But as you wrote, that this interpretation is incorrect. The meaning of simple types, and simple contents won't change by presence of inherited attributes. Inherited attributes only exist in the context of a particular descendant element (but they cannot be psysically present in the descendant elements, if the descendant element's type is simple). Inherited attribute can be referred in conditional type alternatives, and I think, also in assertions. So is it right to believe, that inheritable attributes are designed in the spec, to be usable only in conditional type alternatives (CTA), and assertions? Or they can have usage, other than these two facilities (CTA and assertions)? Regards, Mukul -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 4 August 2009 04:30:35 UTC