- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 20:17:24 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=7069 --- Comment #3 from Dave Peterson <davep@iit.edu> 2009-07-17 20:17:24 --- (In reply to comment #2) > I can't see the analogy. Specifying mode="none" with a wildcard seems like > nonsense to me: "there is no wildcard, and here it is". It's like allowing <e > xsi:nil="true">content</e> - if an element is nilled, then it can't have > content. Isn't it more like "nothing is allowed to satisfy this, hence a wildcard present represents inaccessible optional content"? (Much like content that gets maxOccurs zero.) -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 17 July 2009 20:17:33 UTC