Re: [Bug 6911] Include xs:documentation in xs:assert examples

Does this mean nothing will be done?  When I mentioned following Michael's 
suggestion I was referring to:

> On balance, yes, let's do it. If we just put it in an example with no
> recommendations, we can leave the community to develop conventions.
i.e. update the example, but not recommend that the annotation should be 
usable as an error message etc.

Thanks,

Pete Cordell
Codalogic Ltd
Interface XML to C++ the easy way using XML C++
data binding to convert XSD schemas to C++ classes.
Visit http://codalogic.com/lmx/ or http://www.xml2cpp.com
for more info
----- Original Message ----- 
From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
To: <www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org>
Sent: Friday, July 17, 2009 4:25 PM
Subject: [Bug 6911] Include xs:documentation in xs:assert examples


>
> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6911
>
>
> David Ezell <David_E3@VERIFONE.com> changed:
>
>           What    |Removed                     |Added
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
>         Resolution|                            |WONTFIX
>
>
>
>
> --- Comment #4 from David Ezell <David_E3@VERIFONE.com>  2009-07-17 
> 15:25:08 ---
> Based on WG discussion and on Pete Cordell's comment, the WG believes that 
> it's
> best to encourage community development, and that the WG might want to 
> create a
> note to cover this issue if it still seems relevant in the future.  So the 
> WG
> is closing this bug.
>
>
> -- 
> Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
> ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
> You are the QA contact for the bug.
>
>

Received on Friday, 17 July 2009 15:37:05 UTC