W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org > January to March 2009

[Bug 6722] New: Definition of laxly assessed is not clear

From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2009 16:07:23 +0000
To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
Message-ID: <bug-6722-703@http.www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/>
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6722

           Summary: Definition of laxly assessed is not clear
           Product: XML Schema
           Version: 1.1 only
          Platform: PC
        OS/Version: Windows XP
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: Structures: XSD Part 1
        AssignedTo: David_E3@VERIFONE.com
        ReportedBy: David_E3@VERIFONE.com
         QAContact: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
                CC: cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com


At the telcon the WG approved the following wording in dispensation bug 5412.  
However, the WG wanted to open a new bug against the following wording:

[Definition:]   If the item cannot be ,strictly assessed,, because neither
clause 1.1 nor clause 1.2 above is satisfied● or the necessary components are
missing (see Missing Sub-components (′5.3)●, and the item is not ,skipped,,
the element information item's schema validity must be laxly assessed by
,validating, with respect to ,xs:anyType, as per Element Locally Valid
(Type) (′3.3.4.4) and assessing schema-validity of its [attributes] and
[children] as per clause 2 and clause 3 above. If the element information item
is ,skipped,, it must not be laxly assessed.


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 20 March 2009 16:07:32 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:50:09 UTC