- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 00:12:03 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6447 C. M. Sperberg-McQueen <cmsmcq@w3.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |needsAgreement --- Comment #2 from C. M. Sperberg-McQueen <cmsmcq@w3.org> 2009-01-21 00:12:02 --- Speaking for myself, I agree that the current rules are broken and should be changed. (My preference is to change them as part of a systematic effort to remove the ad hoc paternalistic rules of the spec.) But I note that the WG has in fact discussed either this precise question, or closely related questions, before, and established that (at least at that time) we could not achieve consensus either way on what to do about them. See, for example, the minutes of the meeting in Redmond in August, 2004 (discussion of RQ-147b) at http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2004/08/xml-schema-ftf-minutes.html#id2608195 The minutes do not show, but I remember fairly vividly, that we spent an hour or two on the issue, and feelings ran rather high; they do show that we did not achieve any consensus at all. So my personal recommendation is to classify this issue, in view of the calendar date, as LATER. I'd like to resolve it, but I do not want to delay XSD 1.1 for a fruitless attempt to reach consensus on it, or even for a successful revision of the spec in this regard. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 21 January 2009 00:12:11 UTC