- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2009 20:53:39 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6235
Sandy Gao <sandygao@ca.ibm.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Keywords|needsReview |resolved
Resolution| |FIXED
--- Comment #3 from Sandy Gao <sandygao@ca.ibm.com> 2009-01-05 20:53:39 ---
During its 2008-12-12 telecon, the schema WG adopted a proposal to address this
issue.
The proposal can be found at (member-only):
http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2004/06/xmlschema-1/structures.b6235.html
The change is very similar to the suggestion given in comment #1. A new note is
inserted after clause 2:
Note: If there is no <simpleType> among the [children] of <restriction>
(and if therefore SB is ·xs:anySimpleType·), the result will be a simple
type definition component which fails to obey the constraints on simple
type definitions, including for example clause 1.1 of Derivation Valid
(Restriction, Simple) (§3.16.6.2).
With the addition of this note, the WG believes that the issue raised in this
bug report is addressed. I'm marking this RESOLVED accordingly.
Michael, if you would indicate your concurrence with or dissent from the WG's
disposition of the comment by closing or reopening the issue, we'll be
grateful. If we don't hear from you in the next two weeks, we'll assume that
silence implies consent.
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 5 January 2009 20:53:49 UTC